Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abhishek Grover Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abhishek Grover Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) Can’t Decide Merits Without First Condoning Delay-  ITAT Delhi Remands Crypto Closing-Stock Case Delhi ITAT ‘A’ Bench in Abhishek Grover vs ITO, Hisar (ITA No.4304/Del/2024, AY 2018-19, order dated 23-12-2025) set aside the CIT(A)’s order and remanded the matter, holding that deciding an appeal on merits without first condoning the delay is illegal. Assessee’s appeal before CIT(A) was dismissed as time-barred (delay of 139 days), yet CIT(A) simultaneously dealt with merits, including addition of ₹11.05 lakh towards closing stock of crypto...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930