This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Corporate Restructuring Not a Sufficient Cause for 802-Day Delay u/s 253(3): ITAT Panaji
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Union Bank of India Vs DCIT (ITAT Panaji)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Panaji
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Union Bank of India Vs DCIT (ITAT Panaji)
ITAT Dismisses Union Bank’s Appeals as Time-Barred; Holds Corporate Restructuring Not a “Sufficient Cause” for 802-Day Delay u/s 253(3)
Summary: In Union Bank of India Vs DCIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Panaji dismissed the bank’s appeals for Assessment Years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2014-15 as time-barred due to a delay of about 802–803 days beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 253(3) of the Income-tax Act. The dispute originated from TDS defaults identified during a survey under Section 133A at a branch of Corpo...
Author Info
