Hon’ble High Court holds that replacement of machinery resulting in enduring benefit amounts to capital expenditure, not revenue expenditure
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had allowed the assessee’s claim treating expenditure on replacement of machinery as revenue expenditure under “current repairs.” However, the High Court found that the Tribunal relied solely on a precedent that was subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court. The Madras Court observed that each machine in a textile unit is an independent entity and not part of a single composite system, and replacement of such ma...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


