Case Law Details
Case Name : Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s State Bank of India (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pr. CIT Vs M/s. State Bank of India (Bombay High Court)
Conclusion:
Where employer had incurred genuine expenditure for the welfare and the benefit of the employees, contributions to unapproved and unrecognized funds had to be allowed as a deduction.
Held:
Assessee claimed deduction of expenditure of Rs.50 lakhs towards contribution to a fund created for the health care of the retired employees. Revenue argued that such fund not being one recognized under Section 36(1)(iv) or (v), claim of expenditure was hit by the provisions of Section 40A(9). It was held the very purpose of insertion of sub...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
