Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sha Thanmal Sukhraj Jain & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sha Thanmal Sukhraj Jain & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that confirmation not containing PAN cannot be reason for addition as the confirmations were available with the AO and if he had any doubt regarding he could have again verified with the creditors. Addition in respect of creditors deleted.

Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices issued to the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO on verification of sundry creditors called the assessee to furnish the names and address

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31