Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sha Thanmal Sukhraj Jain & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sha Thanmal Sukhraj Jain & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that confirmation not containing PAN cannot be reason for addition as the confirmations were available with the AO and if he had any doubt regarding he could have again verified with the creditors. Addition in respect of creditors deleted. Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices issued to the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO on verification of sundry creditors called the assessee to furnish the names and address of sundry creditors and confirmation...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031