Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Confirmation from creditors not containing PAN cannot be reason for addition: ITAT Bangalore

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sha Thanmal Sukhraj Jain & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement Sha Thanmal Sukhraj Jain & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that confirmation not containing PAN cannot be reason for addition as the confirmations were available with the AO and if he had any doubt regarding he could have again verified with the creditors. Addition in respect of creditors deleted. Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices issued to the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO on verification of sundry creditors called the assessee to furnish the names and address of sundry creditors...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *