Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Naveen Kumar Musinipally Vs ADIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Naveen Kumar Musinipally Vs ADIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee is a non-resident Indian who entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) cum GPA on 30.12.2015 with M/s Giridhari Homes Pvt. Ltd. for development of land, agreeing to share built-up area in the ratio 47:53. AO invoked section 153C based on seized material from search on a third party &  computed long term capital gains of ₹5.73 crore in AY 2016-17, treating JDA as “transfer” u/s 2(47)(v) r.w.s. 53A. AO adopted SRO value &  denied exemption u/s 54F. CIT(A) upheld jurisdiction &  capital gains for AY 2016-17 but...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031