Whether commission paid to directors were allowable expenditure u/s. 36(1)(ii)?

It was noticed that while commission was paid as a form of remuneration for actual services rendered, dividend is a return of investment and is paid to all its shareholders equally. It was thus held that if the commission is paid for actual services rendered, section 36(1)(ii) will not apply. This decision was followed by this Court in CIT v. Ca

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.