Commission to non-relatives can’t be Suspected for merely on surmises

Rahul Kheria  Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

The commission claimed to have been paid to under section 133(6) to M/s Jessop and Co and we note that the said Jessop replied to the notice. The AO however doubted the reply by Jessop on the ground it was a reputed company so the logo in the letter-head should have been in different colors etc which action of AO cannot be countenanced. We note that the AO has disa

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.