Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Anup P. Nehete Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 5467/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/04/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

On appeal, the assessee filed the details, which are required by the AO, before the CIT(A), but the CIT(A) rejected the same. We find that under the similar circumstances in AY 2005-06 and 2006-07, the CIT(A) admitted the additional evidence and details filed by the assessee and remanded the matter to the AO with a direction to give opportunity of hearing to the assessee in the matter.

After considering the facts of the case, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity may be given to the assessee to substantiate his case by way of submitting the details and evidence available with him, before the AO. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the AO with a direction to decide the issues afresh after considering the details and evidence, which will be filed by the assessee before him, and in accordance with law. Needless, to say the AO shall provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

ITA No. 5467/Mum/2010 – Assessment Year: 2006-07

Dr. Anup P. Nehete

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031