Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramaiah Pushpavati Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramaiah Pushpavati Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee entered into a JDA & handed over possession of part of her property on 01.08.2014 for development of Blocks 1 & 2 of the “Sterling Infinia” project. The AO reopened assessment u/s 147 on the ground that transfer u/s 2(47)(v) occurred in AY 2015-16. He computed LTCG of ₹16.51 crore by adopting FMV of ₹7,900 per sq.ft. (21,061 sq.ft × 7,900 = ₹16.63 crore). Additionally, cash deposits of ₹9 lakh were noticed in her bank account. Assessee claimed that deposits were out of rental income & past cash balance, but since no ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930