Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

PCIT Cannot Rush u/s 263 Without Giving Assessee Adequate Opportunity

Case Law Details

Case Name
Muthyala Suryababu Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-21
Advertisement
Muthyala Suryababu Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹12.50 crore. While computing LTCG, he claimed deduction of ₹10,42,815/- towards arrears of property tax, treating it as part of cost of acquisition / improvement. AO, after assessment proceedings, accepted the claim. On examination of records, PCIT held that arrears of property tax do not fall within “cost of acquisition” or “cost of improvement” as per section 55 r.w.s. 48. Holding that AO failed to verify this aspect, PCIT invoked Explanation 2(a) to section 263, treating the assessment order...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *