Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Thilagavathi Sivaprakasam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Thilagavathi Sivaprakasam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Cash Received at Time of Property Registration Not Hit by Sec.269SS – Penalty u/s 271D Deleted The assessee sold an immovable property for ₹45 lakh, out of which ₹35 lakh was received through banking channel and ₹10 lakh in cash on the date of registration of the sale deed. The Assessing Officer treated the cash receipt as a violation of section 269SS and levied penalty of ₹10 lakh u/s 271D, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). Before the Tribunal, the assessee explained that the property was sold under distress circumstances due to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930