Case Law Details
Case Name : Pappadiyil Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Cochin
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pappadiyil Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in wholesale & retail grocery business, had filed its return declaring income of ₹18.02 lakh. AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) determining income at ₹1.00 Cr. While doing so, AO made two major additions – ₹64.98 lakh being cash deposits in specified bank notes during demonetisation & ₹17.35 lakh disallowed u/s 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding ₹20,000.
On appeal, CIT(A) deleted the demonetisation addition of ₹64.98 lakh but confirmed the disallowance of ₹17.35 lakh u/s 40A(3).
Assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
One Comment
Cancel reply
It my be noted that clause (j) in Rule 6DD which read as under:
‘(j) where the payment was required to be made on a day on which the banks were closed either on account of holiday or strike;’
was OMITTED by Notification No. G.S.R. 56(E), dated 29.1.2020 (w.e.f. 26.3.1962)