Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Solanki Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharat Solanki Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Buyer Can’t Be Taxed on Builder’s Confession Alone- Third-Party Excel & Statements Not Enough- No Cross-Examination, No Direct Evidence—₹12.87 Lakh 69C Additions Quashed by ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT ‘B’ Bench in Bharat Solanki vs DCIT (ITA Nos. 6523 to 6525/Mum/2025, AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20, order dated 23-12-2025) allowed the assessee’s appeals and deleted additions made u/s 69C towards alleged “on-money” paid in cash for purchase of a shop, holding that additions based solely on third-party digital records and statements—without cross...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930