Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Solanki Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Bharat Solanki Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Buyer Can’t Be Taxed on Builder’s Confession Alone- Third-Party Excel & Statements Not Enough- No Cross-Examination, No Direct Evidence—₹12.87 Lakh 69C Additions Quashed by ITAT Mumbai

Mumbai ITAT ‘B’ Bench in Bharat Solanki vs DCIT (ITA Nos. 6523 to 6525/Mum/2025, AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20, order dated 23-12-2025) allowed the assessee’s appeals and

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT-263 Upheld for Inadequate Inquiry in Search Assessment: ITAT Mumbai Section 69C Not Invokable: ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Bogus 80GGC Case Section 54 Deduction Allowed Even If Original Return Was Not Filed: ITAT Mumbai No Section 271AAA Penalty Where Search Disclosure Was Proper: ITAT Kolkata Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 5% Where Sales Are Undisputed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031