Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nijhawan Travel Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 5064/Del/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/05/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nijhawan Travel Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

In a noteworthy judgement, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, ruled in favor of Nijhawan Travel Services Pvt. Ltd. against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT), setting an important precedent in the financial domain. The dispute centered around whether the loss from a Chit Fund used for business purposes could be considered as a business loss. The ITAT ultimately sided with the Assessee, Nijhawan Travel Services, permitting the classification of the Chit Fund loss as a business loss.

Analysis: The initial appeal by the Assessee was against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi, pertaining to a disallowance on account of advances return and loss from Chit Fund. The ITAT meticulously analyzed the facts and circumstances of the case. The major point of contention was the consideration of loss from Chit Fund as a business expense.

Upon careful review, ITAT referred to the CBDT Circular no. 1175 of 16.05.1978, which interprets that the members of a Chit Fund who receive money earlier essentially contribute more, incurring a loss. This loss can be considered equivalent to interest taken for the money advanced. Hence, if the Chit Fund money was used for business purposes, the incurred loss should be regarded as a business expense.

Conclusion: After analyzing the contentions and the relevant CBDT circular, ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the Assessee. It held that the loss from the Chit Fund, when used for business purposes, should be allowed as a business loss. Further, it ordered the issue to be restored to the files of the Assessing Officer (AO) to investigate the use of Chit Fund money for business purposes. The ruling signifies a crucial development in tax jurisprudence, potentially influencing similar future cases.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031