Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohmmadharoon Babubhai Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohmmadharoon Babubhai Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Once assessee places primary evidence substantiating source the onus shifts on Revenue to rebut the same with cogent material Ahmedabad ITAT has deleted an addition made u/s 68 in respect of cash deposits during the demonetisation period, accepting  Assessee’s explanation that the source was genuine agricultural income. Assessee, an individual, derived income from agriculture &  filed return declaring total income of  Rs 2,33,290/-. During the demonetisation period (08.11.2016 to 31.12.2016), he deposited  Rs 12,05,500 in Spec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930