Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : O.B.C. Vs Commr. of Income Tax-1 & ANR. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA 20/1999
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The position in law is clear that if the provision for bonus had been computed on the basis of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 then it would be an ascertained liability. However, if it was only estimation then it could not be regarded as an ascertained liability. Since, the position is not clear on facts, we direct that the assessing officer should determine as to whether the computation of the provision for bonus was on the basis of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. If so, the said provision would have to be treated as an ascertained liability. On the contrary, if he finds the provision for payment of bonus was not in accordance with the provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and it was merely estimation then the original assessment of the assessing officer would hold.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI

 Judgment delivered on: 14.02.2013

ITA 20/1999

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031