Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maharashtra Corporation Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maharashtra Corporation Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchases—Full 69C Disallowance Set Aside: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 6% Despite Kanak Impex The Mumbai ITAT (A-Bench) partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2017-18, holding that a 100% disallowance of alleged bogus purchases under Section 69C was not sustainable on the facts. While the AO and CIT(A) had added the entire ₹10.23 crore based largely on a director’s statement (sale-in-transit) and reliance on Kanak Impex, the Tribunal found that documentary evidence remained uncontroverted—purchase invoices, banking...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930