Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sarvana Prasad Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Sarvana Prasad Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Bangalore ITAT : No Addition in Unabated 153A Assessments Without True ‘Incriminating Material’ – Mere Change of Head of Income Not Permissible The Bangalore ITAT held that in respect of completed/unabated assessments, additions under section 153A can be made only on the basis of real incriminating material unearthed during search. The Tribunal observed that a mere change of opinion regarding the head of income or legal characterization of already disclosed transactions does not amount to incriminating material. Accordingly, additions made by t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031