Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs. Escotrac Finance & Investments Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The assessing officer’s analysis of what really the transaction was, was based on the correct understanding of the legal position emanating from section 36(1)(vii) of the Act. This corresponds to section 2(10)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, which was interpreted by the Supreme Court in A.V. Thomas & Co. Ltd. (supra). There, the Court explained that “a debt means something more than a mere advance. It means something which is related to business or results from it. To be claimable as a bad or doubtful debt it must first be shown as a proper debt”. The Revenue is right in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930