Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Smt. Syama Reddy Malireddy (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Smt. Syama Reddy Malireddy (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad held that for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Act, it is essential for the assessee to prove that she does not have more than a residential house at the time of claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act.

Facts- In the present case, assessee had claimed deduction u/s 54F of Rs.3,63,73,330/-towards purchase of residential property at Hyderabad. However, the claim of assessee was not allowed by the Assessing Office

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31