Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Pankaj Rathi Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), XXXVII (Calcutta High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Pankaj Rathi Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court)- If assessee has not furnished the correct particulars of his income, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be levied on the ground that there was mensrea involved It is obvious that it must be shown that the conditions under Section 271 (1)(c) must exist before the penalty is imposed. There can be no dispute that everything would depend upon the Return filed because that is the only document, where the assessee can furnish the particulars of his income. When such particulars are found to be inaccurate, the liability would arise. In Dilip N. Shroff v. Joint ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930