Case Law Details
Facts of the case:
AO had disallowed the expenses u/s 14A by applying the rule 8D for the A.Y 07-08 but the assessee argued and gave the supporting of the decided case law by Hon’ble High Court in its own decision in which it was decided that the sec 14A would be applicable from A.Y 08-09 and it would not have any retrospective effect.
Contention of the assessee:
Assessee was of the view that the rule 8D of sec 14A would be applicable from A.Y 08-09 but not from A.Y 07-08 which was supported by the Hon’ble High Court in asseesee’s own case in which it was decided that the rule 8D would be applicable from A.Y 08-09 not from A.Y 07-08 and had no retrospective effect.
Contention of the Revenue:
Revenue was of the view that the rule 8D was applicable in A.Y 07-08 also because it had a retrospective effect. So the same would be disallowed .
Held by the respective court:
Court had held that the Hon’ble Gujrat High Court in assessee’s own case held that the held that provisions of Rule 8D are applicable from A.Y. 2008-09 and had not retrospective effect. Therefore there was mistake in the ITAT order so the same should be recalled by the ITAT.
