This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Apex court can dismiss appeal on account of vagueness, leaving question of law open
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi Vs Gold Tax Furnishing Industries (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi
Versus
Gold Tax Furnishing Industries
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1620 OF 2004
S.L.P. (C) NO. 14936 OF 2004
AUGUST 30, 2012
ORDER
Civil Appeal No.1620 of 2004:
Heard learned counsel on both sides.
In the present case, we find that the Assessment Order does not give effect to the amount seized in the calculation of tax payable at the end of the Assessment Year in question. Further, there is no Demand Notice and there is no basis for claiming interest on advance tax due on 15th September, 15th December and 15th March. On account of this vagueness, ...
