Case Law Details
Case Name : I.T.O. Vs Dilip B. Desai (HUF) (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07 & 2009-10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
AO having accepted the claim of exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act for long term capital gains of the assessee had conceded the claim of assessee to be an investor and the ld AO cannot take a different stand by treating the assessee as a trader in respect of short term capital gains alone.
RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE JUDGMENT
5. The brief facts of this issue is that the assessee filed its return of income for Asst Year 2006-07 on 31.7.2006 declaring total income of Rs. 1,22,46,624/- and assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act assessing the total income at Rs. 1,22,46,620/- by the ld AO. Later ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

