Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kumari Kumar Advani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The only point of dispute by the assessee is that while processing such return under section 143(1) of the Act, interest under section 234C of the Act was levied on account of shortfall in payment of advance tax on first and second installments, due on 15/09/2011 and 15/12/2011, in respect of gift of Rs.10.00 crores claimed to have been received on 17/12/2011. On such deferment in payment of instalments, interest of Rs.7,66,070/- was charged under section 234C of the Act. It was, therefore, contended that assessee was not liable to pay advance tax on 15/9/2011 and 15/12/2011 as the receipt of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031