Case Law Details
Case Name : Leena Kasbekar Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08 To 2009-10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Leena Kasbekar Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The assessing officer invoked provisions of Rule 8D(2)(iii) and disallowed 0.5% of average value of investments towards expenditure in relation to earning exempt income. According to the assessing officer, from assessment year 2008-09 onwards, in view of specific provisions provided by way of Rule 8D(2) to determine the disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income, the assessee cannot take a stand that there is no expenditure incurred to earn exempt income. The assessee claims that she had not incurred any expenditure to earn exempt inc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


