Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Essae Suhagraja Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Essae Suhagraja Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) AO Cannot Blow Hot & Cold—TDR Allowed; Penalty Deleted; Interest Disallowance Gone- Contradictory Stand by AO on TDR Cost—ITAT Directs Allowance; Penalty u/s 270A Deleted; Interest Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) Also Reversed AY 2018-19 – TDR Cost of ₹5.45 Cr Assessee claimed cost of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) as business expenditure. AO disallowed it in reassessment holding: No sale of flats in FY 2017-18 → TDR must be capitalised into WIP Deduction allowable only when flats are sold However, in AY 2020-21 asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930