Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT V/s The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (2011-TIOL-35-ITAT-MUM)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Sponsored
Premium paid in excess of the face value of the security held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (‘HTM’) category which has been amortised over the period remaining till maturity is allowable – rules Mumbai Tax Tribunal
Facts
• The Assessee had a unit at Bhopal which was not functioning since the assessment year 1997-98.
• The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (‘the assessee’) was a company engaged in the business of banking.
• The assessee had filed its Return of Income claiming loss on valuation of investments which included an amount towards amortization of premium paid for securities held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (HTM) category.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.