Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT V/s The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (2011-TIOL-35-ITAT-MUM)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Premium paid in excess of the face value of the security held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (‘HTM’) category which has been amortised over the period remaining till maturity is allowable – rules Mumbai Tax Tribunal

Facts

• The Assessee had a unit at Bhopal which was not functioning since the assessment year 1997-98.

• The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (‘the assessee’) was a company engaged in the business of banking.

• The assessee had filed its Return of Income claiming loss on valuation of investments which included an amount towards amortization of premium paid for securities held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (HTM) category.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031