Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Manilal Bhamjibhai Shah (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Manilal Bhamjibhai Shah (ITAT Ahmedabad) Alleged Bogus Freight Receipts from Electrotherm: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹3.52 Crore Addition u/s 69 The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal challenging deletion of an addition of ₹3.52 crore made under section 69 on account of alleged undisclosed freight income. The assessee, engaged in transport business, was alleged to be a beneficiary of bogus transportation charges booked by M/s Electrotherm India Ltd., based on information from the Investigation Wing. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue failed to bring any mat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Complianc U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031