Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sahney Kirkwood Private Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.: 6776/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/05/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The facts of the case are that the assessee had leased its property at Vidyavihar to Minicon Insulated Wires Pvt. Ltd. (MIWPL) at Rs. 22,56,000, which in turn was leased out by MIWPL to various other parties, from which it was receiving rents of Rs. 1,59,34,618. The AO, relying on the orders of the preceding years, added the rents received by MIWPL at Rs. 1,59,34,618 in the hands of the assessee, holding that the rent agreement between the assessee and MIWPL was a sham, and the entire rent received by the company actually belonged to the assessee, as assessee and MIWPL are related parties.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

ITA No.: 6776/Mum/2010 – Assessment Year: 2007-08

Sahney Kirkwood Private Limited

Vs.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Advocate Radheshyam Modi says:

    The present judgment does not give the reasons of the relief given to the assessee on this count of Lease and sublease amounts. Hence we fail to appreciate in the absence of the reasons for getting relief. The amount of relief runs into crore and attachment of the order giving relief would have made the reading of the present judgment fruitful.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031