Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muppavarapu Kavitha Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Muppavarapu Kavitha Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

It was contended that mother of the assessee is staying with her daughter, who is the only daughter and hence the benefit of CBDT Instruction No. 1916 should also be extended to the mother of the assessee.

Admitted facts are that the gold jewellery belonging to family members was seized to the extent of 1628.025 grams and there is no dispute on the fact that as per the CBDT Instruction No.1916, dated 11/5/1994 that in a case of a person who

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31