Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs. Parle Plastics Ltd. (2011) 332 ITR 63 (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Sponsored
CIT Vs. Parle Plastics Ltd. (2011) 332 ITR 63 (Bombay High Court)
Under section 2(22), dividend does not include, inter alia, any advance or loan made to a shareholder by a company in the ordinary course of its business, where the lending of money is a substantial part of the business of the company. The expression used in the exclusion provision of section 2(22) is “substantial part of the business”. The expression “substantial part” does not connote an idea of
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.