Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Vivil Exports P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.509/Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The following disallowances were made by the AO by invoking  provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act: –

1 Disallowance on account of transportation charges  paid to M/s. Lalji Mulji – Rs. 1 ,59,386/-

2 Disallowance on account of export freight charges paid – Rs. 6, 17,830/ –

3 Disallowance on account of export freight paid to Indian agents of foreign shipping companies – Rs. 3,70,062/-

In the opinion of the AO as well as the CIT(A), non-deduction of tax at source attracts provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and accordingly added the amount paid by the assessee as income of the assessee for the year under consideration.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. G S Krishnan says:

    As SLP on the case of vector shipping by the Revenue was dismissed by the Apex court, it is a settled law that the expenses paid during the previous year does not attract disallowance under section 40(a)( ia).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031