Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahendra Kishanlal Prajapati Vs Vishwanath Builders (NAA)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mahendra Kishanlal Prajapati Vs Vishwanath Builders (NAA)

The Authority finds that the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit of 3.75% of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent for the project ‘Sarathya’. This benefit was required to be passed on to the recipients. Thus, Section 171 of the CGST, 2017 has been contravened by the Respondent. inasmuch as the additional benefit of ITC @3.75% of the base price received by the Respondent during the period 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2020, was required to he passed on by th

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31