Jai Pankaj Narayan*
In the dynamic landscape of India’s tax system, the introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in 2017 marked a transformative shift, consolidating 17 indirect taxes. GST aimed to simplify tax structures, enhance economic cohesion, and reduce complexities in compliance. As this taxation paradigm unfolded, it gave rise to GST litigation, a crucial aspect tackling disputes in interpretation, application, and compliance. This article unravels the intricate tapestry of GST litigation, exploring its challenges, objectives, and the evolving legal framework. Delve into the complexities of GST disputes and the imperative role they play in shaping India’s tax landscape.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1.What is GST?
Goods and Services Tax (GST) is the coalescence of 17 types of Indirect Taxes in India. In layman terms, GST is the replacement of all 17 Indirect taxes. There are two types of taxes in India – Direct and Indirect. While GST replaces the Indirect taxes, Direct taxes stands persistent. Broadly classified, only three categories of people are liable to pay this tax –
First, the Individual whose Yearly Turnover is more than ₹20 Lakh regardless of profit or loss
Second, whose business is operated interstate (one state to other state)
Third, one carries out any transaction online (UPI).
GST has four types:
- Central GST (C-GST)
- State GST (S-GST)
- Union Territory GST (UT-GST)
- Integral GST (I-GST)
Depending on the nature, value and place of the transaction, the individual is required to pay tax which will be divided into any two types of the categories mentioned above i.e if the transaction is carried out within a state the tax will be divided into State GST and Central GST. If the same is done in a Union Territory then the tax will be divided between Union Territory (UT-GST) and the Central Government(C-GST). When the transaction is between two different states then there is Integrated GST.
1.2.Why was it introduced
GST was introduced to replace the existing intricate and disjoint tax framework with a consolidated system aimed at simplifying adherence, alleviating tax layering, and fostering economic cohesion. It reduced the cost of establishing and running business, moreover it aimed at reducing the cascading effect and the doubt of double taxation. The introduction of GST solved complications while distribution of tax was done between state and central government, state and state government.
1.3.Role of GST in Indian Economy
GST has proved to be advantageous to Indian Economy. It has directly increased the tax intake of the government by help of online procedures like form filling, bill payment. GST has streamlined the taxation system, reducing complexities and making taxes more manageable. It also reduced the burden of taxes by diminishing the cascading effect, the consumers and the business owners have profited from this. GST has made the tax system more efficient by effectively structuring the collection and distribution of tax among states.
2. What is GST Litigation
GST was implemented back in 2017 and yet is incipient. As time passes by, new disputes pops out of implementation of Good and Services tax regarding the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of GST. These disputes are the architect for future litigation with respect to GST. GST litigation reduces complications in classification of goods & services, calculation of tax liability, applicability of GST exemption.
2.1.The Concept of GST Litigation
One of the key reasons for GST litigation is the intricate nature of the tax structure, which compromises multiple tax slabs and various compliance requirements. Taxpayers often find it challenging to interpret the complex provisions, resulting in unintentional errors or differences in interpretation. This has led to disputes regarding tax liability, classification of goods and services, and the eligibility of input tax credits.
2.2.Key Objectives
Chief objective of GST Litigation framework is to solve disputes between tax payer and tax authorities. It aims to do so by unifying various taxes (17 Indirect Taxes).
The objectives of GST can be outlined as follows
- Fair Resolution: GST Litigation involves addressing differences in interpretation, classification, valuation, and other aspects of GST that may lead to conflicts between taxpayers and tax authorities.
- Legal Clarity: GST litigation seeks to provide legal clarity on ambiguous or contentious provisions within the GST law.
- Efficient Dispute Resolution: Timely resolution of GST disputes is crucial for maintaining a smooth and efficient business environment.
- Compliance Assurance: GST Litigation aims to promote compliance amongst tax payers by addressing the disputes and conflicts that arise
- Promotion of Taxpayer Rights: The resolution of GST disputes includes safeguarding the rights of taxpayers.
2.3.Advantages
- Preventing Arbitrary Actions: Taxpayers can challenge the decision taken by the tax authorities which they feel infringes their rights.
- Uniformity: As GST litigation progresses, higher courts or tribunals can contribute to uniformity in the application of GST laws by systematic rulings across the country.
- Taxpayer Rights Guarded: GST litigation acts a safeguard of taxpayers and ensures that their rights are not infringed.
- Development of Tax Laws: Amendments and clarifications resulting from resolution of disputes contribute to the ongoing refinement of the GST framework.
- Easement of Litigation: As the GST system nurtures and legal interpretations become more definitive, the frequency and intensity of litigation may decrease.
3. Overview of GST Litigation
Goods and Services Tax (GST) litigation embodies the legal disputes that arise between taxpayers and tax authorities concerning the interpretation, application, and compliance of GST laws. Introduced in 2017, GST aimed to align the indirect tax structure by unifying various taxes levied by both central and state governments. However, the entangling GST framework, coupled with diverse business operations, has led to an abundant number of disputes.
The objective of GST litigation is to ensure proper functioning of Tax structure, also no taxpayer shall be deprived of his rights and gets to challenge decision taken by tax authorities which he may find arbitrary. The litigation process contributes to the evolution of GST laws, establishing legal precedents and promoting consistency in their application. While GST litigation poses challenges, it is an integral part of the overall tax system, fostering legal clarity, compliance, and the protection of taxpayer rights. As GST evolves, dispute resolution mechanisms become more effective for maintaining a transparent tax environment in India.
3.1.Scope of GST Litigation
The scope of Goods and Services Tax (GST) litigation in India is very lucrative, reflecting the intricate nature of the GST framework. GST litigation solves a spectrum of issues arising from the interpretation and implementation of GST laws, with respect to various aspects of taxation and compliance.
In conclusion, the scope of GST litigation in India is comprehensive, covering widespread aspects of taxation and compliance. The evolving nature of the GST framework, coupled with the complexity of business operations, ensures that the landscape of GST litigation remains dynamic. As businesses strive to navigate this intricate terrain, effective dispute resolution mechanisms become paramount for maintaining clarity, consistency, and fairness within the GST system.
3.2.Aspects of Legal Disputes
A crucial component of legal issues in GST lawsuits are valuation disagreements. Precisely estimating the value of products or services is essential to precisely computing the GST obligation. The inclusion or absence of certain components from the value, like discounts, free supply, and related-party transactions, may give rise to legal problems. It takes a sophisticated grasp of valuation principles and how they fit with GST legislation to resolve these conflicts.
The aspects of legal disputes within GST litigation underscore the intricacies and challenges that comes along with the tax framework. Interpretation, eligibility of credits, valuation, geographical variations, sector-specific complexities, and anti-profiteering regulations collectively contribute to the multifaceted nature of legal disputes. As businesses grapple with these complexities, effective legal mechanisms and forums become essential for fostering a fair, transparent, and consistent GST environment.
4. Legal Framework for GST Litigation
GST is an indirect tax which tends to simplify the complex and tangled system of tax collection and distribution between the state and central government. The legal framework of GST Litigation is based on a dual model in which both the central and state government have authority to collect tax from their respective territories. The Central Government administers the Central GST and the State Government administers the State GST, also there is Integrated GST, when the business is carried out between two states. These systems are created to facilitate the effective collection and distribution of taxes reducing any sort of disputes and conflicts between Tax Authorities. The legal framework of GST Litigation is a mutual effort between the State Government and the Central Government for a unified and simplified tax system of nation.
5. Challenges Faced in resolving GST Disputes
- Conflict between Authorities: Goods and Services Tax (GST) Litigation has faced plethora of problems since its implementation since 2017, a major cause for complexity lies in the structure of GST itself. The multi-layered structure built for tax collection and distribution often leads to disparities between State Government and the Central Government. Disparities arise regarding jurisdiction and ambiguous interpretation of laws.
- Absence of dedicated GST Tribunal: Considering the absence of a dedicated GST tribunal, the cases have been added to the long list of pending cases of already overburdened Courts. These issues compound which results in delayed imparting of justice.
- Fraudulent Activities: Deceptive acts and Tax Evasions have been a hindrance in GST Litigation. Identifying tactics to overcome this while also ensuring fair and just trials require efficient mechanism.
- Technical Glitches: While Technology has proven to be eased life in numerous ways, technical glitches as delay in filing return and issue with network also create conflicts between the taxpayers and the tax authorities.
6. Conclusion
In India, GST litigation is a significant component of the tax system and has been handling GST framework challenges since 2017. Even though the GST has simplified taxes and eliminated the previous tax system’s complexity, difficulties still exist. The legal framework, which is based on a dual model, aims at a unified tax system, yet complications often arise, giving way to disputes. There needs to be amendment in the GST law and a separate tribunal with appropriate freedom and authority should be established to deal with tax-related issues. For a nation like India, taxes are a significant source of revenue, and thus, they should be managed appropriately to avoid causing conflict between the people and the government and to ensure that the intended goals of taxation are met.
****
*Author Jai Pankaj Narayan is a first-year student at Gujarat National Law University.
