This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 130 of GST does Not Apply to Excess Stock Confiscation: Allahabad HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shree Om Steels Vs Additional Commissioner and Ors. (Allahabad High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Allahabad High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shree Om Steels Vs Additional Commissioner and Ors. (Allahabad High Court)
In Shree Om Steels v. Additional Commissioner, the Allahabad High Court ruled that confiscation proceedings under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act cannot be initiated solely on the basis of excess stock discovered during a survey. The petitioner, M/s Shree Om Steels, challenged the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed following a survey under Section 67 of the CGST Act. The authorities initiated proceedings under Sections 130 and 122, claiming excess stock was found. H...





