Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

In the recent ruling of High Court of Madras : ARS Steels & Alloy International Pvt. Ltd. v. State Tax Officer (2021) 35 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 12, it was  held that;

The situations as set out in S.17(5)(h), CGST Act, 2017 indicate loss of inputs that are quantifiable, and involve external factors or compulsions. A loss that is occasioned by consumption in the process of manufacture is one which is inherent to the process of manufacture itself. It has to be understood in the context of a manufacturing process, which result in some kind of a loss such as evaporation, creation of by-products, etc. The total quantity of inputs that went into the making of the finished product represents the inputs of such products in entirety.

No Reversal of ITC on Goods Lost during Manufacturing Process

Held that the reversal of ITC involving S.17(5)(h) by the revenue, in cases of loss by consumption of input, proportionate to the loss of the input, which is inherent to manufacturing loss is misconceived & such loss is not contemplated/covered by the situations adumbrated u/s 17(5)(h).”

The ratio decidedi of the above judgment is centered around;

i) Loss of inputs that are quantifiable and

ii) Loss of inputs involve external factors or compulsions, i.e., A loss

is inherent to the process of manufacture itself, such as evaporation, creation of by-products, etc.

In the case of Union of India & Ors. v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. and Ors. (2014) 21 J.K.Jain’s Vat Reporter (SC), full ITC was allowed on the entire raw material used for manufacture of final product irrespective of tax free bye-product produced as a result of technological necessity.

Such loss of Inputs is not contemplated/covered by the situations adumbrated u/s 17(5)(h), GST Act. As such, no Proportionate ITC reversal is needed for Loss of Inputs in the Manufacturing Process.

Per Rule 42, GST Rules also supports the above Ratio decidendi, where while calculating ITC, in the Formula for deductions (T2), the word “exclusively” is used before the wordseffecting exempt supplies”.

For further details, refer magazine (2022)  37 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR,  page R-3

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am s/o J.K.Jain , Jaipur & is Writer & Analyst of Fortnightly magazine "J.K.Jain's GST & VR". Extended Consultation work of GST. Expert in Commentary of GST/VAT. My e-mail ID is [email protected] & Tel No. is 9414300730/9462749040/0141-3584043. Analytical interpretation of GS View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Judgment Analysis: GST on Royalty in Mining Case Royalty Collection Contractor – Levy of GST- Constitutional Validity of Condition in notfn 14/2018-CT(R) GST on Royalty on Minerals excavated from Mines – Constitutional Validity Delayed submission of Reconciliation Statement in GSTR-9C – Late Fee/Penalty not leviable Affiliation granted for imparting education is not exempt View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930