Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : National Steel Agencies Vs Asst.State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C).No.30059 of 2019(F)
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/11/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

National Steel Agencies Vs Asst. State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)

As per Section 129 of GST Act, the detention notice has been passed on the ground that the validity period of the e-way bill that accompanied the transportation had already expired at the time of detention.

Here HC direct that if the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty amount quantified in order, then the respondents shall release the consignment and the vehicle to the petitioner.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 detention notice issued to him under Section 129 of the GST Act. I note from the perusal of Ext.P4 detention notice that the detention was on the ground that the validity period of the e-way bill that accompanied the transportation had already expired at the time of detention. Under the said circumstances, I find that the detention cannot be said to be unjustified.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031