Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subhash Chandra Tyagi Vs Directorate General Of Goods And Service Tax (Rajasthan High Court)
Appeal Number : S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13338/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/11/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Subhash Chandra Tyagi Vs Directorate General Of Goods And Service Tax (Rajasthan High Court)

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Criminal Complaint No. DGGI /320/ Gr.I/ INV/ GST/ SCT/ 15/2019 registered at Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court), District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 132 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short- ‘GST Act, 2017’) and later on for the offence under Section 132 (1) (i) (iv) of GST Act, 2017.

Rajasthan HC grants bail to person accused of wrongfully availing ITC under GST

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. She submitted that the companies, said to be fake, have been closed after obtaining NOC from the competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that an amount of Rs. 2.6 crore has already been recovered from the petitioner. She submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.01.2020, complaint has already been filed against him on 05.03.2020, the investigation against co-accused persons is said to be pending, the offence is compoundable and is punishable with maximum sentence of 5 years. She submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and prays for his release on bail.

Per contra, opposing the bail application, learned counsel for the complainant submitted that there are grave allegations against the petitioner of fraudulently obtaining input tax credit and passing of forged GST credit to the tune of Rs. 33.50 crore. He submitted that the investigation is still pending and hence, the petitioner does not deserve indulgence of bail.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031