Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Nilkamal Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Nilkamal Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)

The impugned product i.e. poultry crate is an article of plastic. It is used for the conveyance of poultry and from a reading of para 5.5.2 above it is clear that the said product is clearly covered under sub heading 392310 of the Tariff. However it is seen that the subject product does not fall under the T.l. 39231010; 39231020; 39231030; and 39231040. Thus, the impugned product will be covered under the residual T.l. i.e. 39231090 of the Tariff.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31