Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Razack Trading Company Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Razack Trading Company Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)

In the recent case of Razack Trading Company Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (W.P.(MD) No. 15302 of 2022), Madras high court held validly upheld the applicability on interest u/s 50 of CGST Act, in case of Erroneous refund.

The petitioner had imported a consignment of split coriander seed and had paid basic customs duty. The petitioner availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the basic customs duty paid by the petitioner under the provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 presumably on th

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Satish Talnikar says:

    There is no discussion whether the dept has filed an appeal against the refund sanction order. Can an SCN be adjudicated without a valid order of the appellate authority setting aside the refund sanction order?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930