Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balaji Traders And Another Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balaji Traders And Another Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Allahabad High Court held that for imposition of penalty under section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [CGST Act] intention to evade payment of tax is a pre-requisite. No penalty u/s 129(3) as there was no intent on part of petitioner to evade tax. Facts- The petitioner – firm is engaged in the business of trading cigarette, pan-masala & food spices. In its normal course of business, the petitioner received an order of supply from one Vaishya Distributors, Nashik (Maharashtra). In pursuance thereof...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930