Follow Us:
A recent judgment by the Patna High Court in the case of  Sai Steel v. State of Bihar on July 28, 2025, provides a crucial clarification on the limitation period for refund claims under Section 77 of the CGST Act. This ruling addresses the common issue of misclassification of supply and subsequent tax payments under the correct head. The court’s decision provides a clear distinction between the limitations under Section 54 and Section 77, offering a significant takeaway for businesses. Facts of the Case The petitioner, a company named Sai Steel, filed all their GST returns for the finan...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Jyoti Baluni is a practicing Chartered Accountant with specialization in indirect taxes, particularly GST. She has represented clients in Litigation, compliances, classification and valuation disputes and frequently contributes to professional publications. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Interest on Reversed ITC If Credit Not Utilised: Orissa HC Clarifies Section 50 Delhi HC to Examine Constitutional Validity of HSNS Cess GST SCN Without fraud, suppression, or misstatement Grounds Invalid for Section 74 invocation: Gauhati HC Cross-State Transfer of ITC On Amalgamation Cannot Be Denied Due To Portal Limitation: Gujarat HC GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without Prior Notice in SCN: P&H HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930