Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tvl Suresh Sethu Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tvl Suresh Sethu Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)

Madras High Court held that notice and order thereof issued for A.Y. 2021-22 instead of 2018-19 in form DRC-01 is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, matter remanded back for passing fresh order on merits.

Facts- Vide the present petition, the petitioner submits they had voluntarily surrendered the registration and the registration was cancelled on 04.10.2021. On the date of cancellation of the registration, the petitioner had stock of goods on which petitioner had availed input tax credit and the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. cecily says:

    Taxpayers get only pyrrhic victories in High Courts. High Courts do not quash irregular SCNs but give undue benefit to revenue by remand. How much the taxpayer spent for a GST demand of Rs 1 lakh ?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30