This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Not passing of ITC deliberately is profiteering & offence under GST law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sh. Sahil Mehta Vs M/s Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sh. Sahil Mehta Vs M/s Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
Respondent has denied the benefit of the ITC to the buyer of the flats being constructed by him in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017, where he had not only collected more price than the entitled amount but also collected more GST on the increased amount. The Respondent though aware of the fact that the net benefit of ITC had to be passed on to his buyers had not passed on the entire benefit till the completion of the investigation by the DGAP. T...






