Non speaking orders are non est and not sustainable

Shyam Textiles Limited Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Madras High Court)

In the given case the crux of the problem lies in the order passed by the learned Commissioner under Section 28A of the Act, which is as brief and non speaking as it could be. The learned Commissioner, while exercising the powers under Section 28A of the Act, which empowers him to pass a quasi judicial order on any point concerning the rate of tax under the Act and which is a wide and significant quasi-judicial power of Advancing Ruling given to the higher authority of the Co

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.