Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lids Advertisers Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 17817 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/06/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Lids Advertisers Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)

Lids Advertisers, a petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) Acts of 2017, filed their GSTR-3B returns for December 2017, January to March 2018, and April 2018 to March 2019 as ‘NIL’. This error occurred due to a mistake by their accountant. Despite this, the petitioner asserted that they had paid the necessary taxes for these periods on time, as evidenced by provided receipts and chalans. However, the Deputy State Tax Officer (the respondent) issued orders (Exts.P10 and P11) demanding significant sums, including interest for the alleged late payment of taxes for the fiscal years 2017-18 and 2018-19.

Petitioner’s Claim:

  • The petitioner contended that they had paid the taxes within the stipulated time under Section 39(7) of the Act, substantiated by Ext.P2 series of payment receipts and Ext.P3 series of chalans.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031