NAA not accepted argument of Increase in Cost on the day of Reduction in GST

Rahul Sharma Vs Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

The Respondent has also claimed that the anti-profiteering provisions were in the nature of restricting the right to carry on trade freely in terms of Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and earn reasonable profit. In this connection it would be pertinent to mention that the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the above Act require a registered person to pass on the benefit of tax reduction or additional ITC to the recipient by

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.