Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Dhanraj Organics Private Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh)
Appeal Number : Order No. 14/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/10/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Dhanraj Organics Private Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh)

The applicant on 22.06.2021 that in the AAR order no. 04/2020 dated 17-06-2021 they found that in Case No. 19/2020 the GSTN No. in page no.1 is wrongly mentioned as 23AADCM7397N1ZU however in Page no. 2 it is correctly mentioned. So therefore rectification is required.

After the perusal of the original order the mistake pointed out by the applicant if found correct. As the mistake is typological error and apparent on the record the Mistake is hence by being rectified and the correct GST No. 23AAACD5735C1Z7 is being mentioned in first page of the order.

It was also seen that while mentioning the Order No. instead of the order No. as 04/2021 by mistake it was mentioned 04/2020. Hence, this typological error is being rectified and thus in place of order no. 04/2020 the order No. is now being mentioned 04/2021.

Read Original Order : Epoxidised Soya bean Oil classifiable under tariff item 1518

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031